|
|||||||||
|
March/April 2000 | Contents
by Andrew Kohut
This is despite the fact that less than half (45 percent) of the public took notice of the proposed AOL-Time Warner merger, according to the Pew Research Center news interest survey. The public has a long-standing suspicion that news organizations are not as independent of outside interests as they claim. I first learned this while conducting focus groups in the mid-1980s about the then newly-minted "credibility crisis." Our roundtable respondents forcefully told us that the news media were often influenced, if not pushed around, by powerful people and organizations. Having spent years listening to politicians and business leaders complain about an over-adversarial media, I chalked this up to the vagaries of the groups we had gathered for our in-depth discussions. But the results of subsequent nationwide surveys bore out what we found in the focus groups. Most Americans in our representative survey at that time believed the press was "often" influenced by power structures -- 65 percent thought advertisers influenced the press, 70 percent cited business, and 73 percent even described the federal government as often bossing the press around. Even without making the big corporate connections, many Americans today think the press is too concerned with the interests of the companies that own them, and the interests of their advertisers as well. Fully 42 percent of Pew's respondents in December described protecting the business interests of owners as a major problem with news organizations these days. And 35 percent said the same about protecting the interests of advertisers. Wealthier and older Americans are more alarmed about this than the young. Fifty percent of those sixty-five and older think the media are too concerned with owners' business interests compared with 36 percent among younger adults. Older respondents are also more concerned than the young about whether the media are too aware of advertiser interests. This same survey found that many people worry that the press may be a lap dog, rather than a watchdog, when bosses' interests are involved. Still, the top complaint about the press was: it is overly focused on reporting the misdeeds and personal failings of public figures (see box). In other words, the public faults the press for being too much of a watchdog when it comes to the pols, but suspects it may turn a blind eye to problems when its owners' corporate interests are at stake. More episodes like Times Mirror's involvement with the Staples Center, and a growing recognition that those who assign and report the news are little fish in big corporate seas, can only stir up long-standing doubts about the press's independence.
|
||||||||